Королевский двор в Англии XV–XVII веков. Коллектив авторовЧитать онлайн книгу.
Th. B. Macaulay’s History of England from the Accession of James II. London, New York, 1906. P. 1–29.
11
Trevelyan G. M. England under the Stuarts. London, 1948. Р. 110.
12
Blaas Р.В.М. Continuity and Anachronism: parliamentary and constitutional development in Whig historiography and the anti-Whig reaction between 1890 and 1930. The Hague, 1978.
13
Tout T. F. Chapters in the Administrative History of Medieval England: In 6 vols. Manchester, 1929. Vol. 1. P. 2.
14
Tout T. F. Chapters in the Administrative History of Medieval England. P. 5.
15
Stubbs W. The Constitutional History of England in Its Origin and Development: In 3 vols. London, 1903. Vol. 1. P. 371.
16
Tout Т. F. Chapters in the Administrative History of Medieval England. Vol. 1. P. 10–31.
17
Элиас Н. Придворное общество. Исследование по социологии короля и придворной аристократии. М., 2002. С. 10–48.
18
Подробнее см.: Krieken R. van. Norbert Elias. London, 1998; Smith D. Norbert Elias and modern social theory. Sage publications, 2001; Salumets Th. Norbert Elias and human interdependencies. McGil-Queen’s University Press, 2001.
19
Elton G. R. The Tudor revolution in Government. Cambridge, 1953; England Under The Tudors. London, 1955; Henry VIII: An essay In Revision. London, 1962; Reform and Renewal: Thomas Cromwell and the Common Weal. Cambridge, 1973; Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and Government: Papers and Reviews. 1945–1972: In 4 vols, Cambridge, 1974–1992.
20
The Eltonian Legacy (Special issue) // Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 1997. Ser. 6. Vol. 7. Р 177–336.
21
По словам Элтона, «непосредственные (direct) причины объясняют, почему было совершено то или иное действие; ситуационные причины объясняют, почему это действие оказалось эффективным» (Цит. по: Roberts G. Defender of the Faith: Geoffrey Elton and the Philosophy of History// Chronicon. 1998. N 2. P. 1–22). – См. также: Skinner Q. Sir Geoffrey Elton and the practice of history // Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 1997. Ser. 6. Vol. 7. P. 301–316.
22
Coleman Ch. Professor Elton’s “Revolution”. // Revolution Reassessed: revisions in the history of the Tudor government and administration // Ed. by Ch. Coleman, D. Starkey. London, 1986. P. 1–11.
23
Burgess G. On Revisionism: an analysis of Early Stuart historiography in the 1970s and 1980s//The Historical Journal. 1990. N 33. P. 609–627.
24
Harriss G. L., Williams P. A Revolution in Tudor History? // Past and Present. 1965. N 31. P. 87–96.
25
Princes Patronage and the Nobility: The Court at the Beginning of the Modern Age / Ed. by R. G. Asch, A. M. Birke. Oxford, 1991; Asch R. G. Nobilities in Transition 1550–1700: Courtiers and Rebels in Britain and Europe. Oxford, 2003.
26
Law and government under the Tudors / Ed. by C. Cross, D. Loades, J. J. Scarisbrick. Cambridge, 1988; Loades D.M. Henry VIII: Court. Church and Conflict. London, 2007.
27
Revolution Reassessed: Revisions in the history of the Tudor government and administration/Ed. by Ch. Coleman, D. Starkey. London, 1986.
28
См. также: Reassessing the Henrican Age / Ed. by A. Fox, J. Guy. Oxford, 1986.
29
Smuts R. M. Court Culture and the Origins of the Royalist Tradition in Early Stuart England. Philadelphia, 1999; Culture and Power in England, 1585–1685 (Social History in perspective). New York, 1999.
30
Aylmer G. 1) The King’s Servants. The Civil Service of Charles I, 1625–1642. London, 1974; 2) Office-Holdings, Wealth and Social Structure in England, 1580–1720//Domanda e consumi. Florence, 1978. P. 247–259; Given-Wilson C. The English Nobility in the Late Middle Ages. London, 1987; Peck L. Court Patronage and Corruption in Early Stuart England. London, 1993; Northampton: Patronage and Policy at the Court of James I. London, 1982.
31
Впервые понятие «военный хаусхолд» было введено Т. Таутом: Tout Т Chapters in the Administrative History of Medieval England: In 6 vols. Manchester, 1937. Vol. II. P. 133, 138.
32
Constitutio Domus Regis // Dialogus de Scaccario and Constititio Domus Regis/Ed. by C. Johnson. Edinburgh, 1950. P. 128–135.
33
О начальных стадиях этого процесса: Prestwick J. The Military Household of the Normam Kings//English Historical Review. 1981. Vol. 96. N 378. P. 1–35; Frame R. The Political Development of the British Isles, 1100–1400. Oxford, 1990. P. 169–188.
34
Хачатурян H. А. Власть и общество в Западной Европе в средние века. М., 2008. С. 231.
35
Такая тенденция останется доминирующей вплоть до начала гражданских войн середины XVII в. – См. об этом: Федоров С. Е. Раннестюартовская аристократия. 1603–1629. СПб., 2005.
36
Барг М.А. Исследования по истории английского феодализма в XI–XIII вв. М., 1962. С. 94–103.
37
Lyon D. The Money Fief under The English Kings, 1066–1485 // English Historical Review. 1951. Vol. 66. N 259. P. 161–193; Harvey S. The Knights and Knight’s Fee in England//Past & Present. 1970. Vol. 49. P. 3–43; Church S. The Rewards of Royal Service in Household of King John: A Dissenting Opinion // English Historical Review. 1995. Vol. 110. N 436. P. 277–303.