An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Adam SmithЧитать онлайн книгу.
– ibid.
Of the mode in which the capital withdrawn from circulation is disposed of – ibid.
The sources which continually renew the circulating capital, as soon as it enters into the fixed capital, or the stock for immediate consumption, are,
1. Lands;
2. Mines and quarries;
3. Fisheries – ibid.
Of the purposes accomplished by circulating coin – book 2, chap. ii; and the expedients which may be resorted to, in order to attain these with less expense, and fewer of those inconveniencies to which money is subjected – ibid.
Of the stock lent at interest; and of those things which regulate the proportion that this kind of stock bears to the whole existing stock of the community. The quantity of stock which may be lent depends in no degree upon the quantity of money in circulation – book 2, chap. iv.
Of the principles which determine the rate of interest – ibid.
There exists a necessary relation between this and the price of land – ibid.
PART THIRD – OF THE MANNER IN WHICH THE MULTIPLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH TAKES PLACE
Wealth uniformly increases in proportion to the augmentation which the power producing it receives, whether that be in energy or in extent– book I. introduction.
Labour, in which this power increases in energy,
1. By the division of the parts of the same work;
2. By the invention of such machines as abridge and facilitate labour – book I, chap. i.
The division of labour adds to its energy,
1. By the skill which the workman in this way acquires;
2. By the saving of time – ibid.
The invention of machines is itself an effect of the division of labour – ibid.
The natural disposition of mankind to exchange with each other the different productions of their respective labours and talents, is the principle which has given birth to the division of labour – book I, chap. ii.
The division of labour must of course be limited by the extent of the market; therefore, whatever tends to widen the market, facilitates the progress of a nation towards opulence – book I, chap. iii.
Labour gains in extent,
1. In proportion to the accumulation of capital;
2. In proportion to the manner in which these are employed – book I, introduction.
The accumulation of capitals is hastened by the increase of the proportion existing between the productive and unproductive consumers – book 2, chap. iii.
The proportion between these two classes of consumers is determined by the proportion existing between that part of the annual produce destined to the replacement of capital, and that destined for the purpose of revenue – ibid.
The proportion between that part of the annual produce which goes to form capital, and that which goes to form revenue, is great in a rich country, and small in a poor one – ibid.
In a wealthy country, the rent of land, taken absolutely, is much greater than in a poor country; but, taken in relation to the capital employed, it is much less – book 2, chap. iii.
In a wealthy country, the whole profits of its capital are infinitely greater than in one that is poor; although a given quantity of capital will, in a country of the latter description, produce profits much greater than in an opulent one – ibid.
It is industry that furnishes the produce; but it is economy that places in the capital that part of it which would otherwise have become revenue – ibid.
The economy of individuals arises from a principle which is universally diffused, and one that is continually in action; the desire of ameliorating their condition. This principle supports the existence and increase of national wealth, in spite of the prodigality of some individuals; and even triumphs over the profusion and errors of governments – ibid.[Pg xxviii]
Of the different modes of spending money, some are more favourable than others to the increase of national wealth – ibid.
Those branches of employment which require a capital, never fail to call forth more or less labour; and thus contribute, in a greater or less degree, to increase the extent of national labour.
Capital can be employed only in four ways:
1. In cultivating and improving the earth, or, in other words, multiplying its rude produce;
2. In supporting manufactures;
3. In buying by the gross, to sell in the same manner;
4. In buying by the gross, to sell by retail.
These four modes of employing capital are equally necessary to, and serve mutually to support, each other. The first supports, beyond all comparison, the greatest number of productive hands; the second occupies more than the two remaining; and the fourth the fewest of any.
Capital may be employed, according to the third mode, in three different ways; each contributing in a very different degree to the support and encouragement of national industry.
When capital is employed in exchanging one description of the produce of national industry for another, it then supports as great a portion of industry as can be done by any capital employed in commerce.
When it is employed in exchanging the produce of national for that of foreign industry, for the purposes of home consumption, half of it goes to the support of foreign industry; by which means, it is only of half that service to the industry of the nation which it would have been had it been employed another way.
Lastly, when it is employed in exchanging one description of the produce of foreign industry for another, or in what is termed the carrying trade, it then serves wholly for the support and encouragement of the industry of the two foreign nations, and adds only to the annual produce of the country the profits of the merchant – book 2, chap. v.
Self-interest, when left uncontrouled, will necessarily lead the proprietors of capitals to prefer that species of employment which is most favourable to national industry, because it is, at the same time, most profitable for themselves – ibid. For, when capitals have been employed in a way different from that suggested by the infallible instinct of self-interest, it has always been in consequence of the peculiar circumstances of the European governments, and of that influence which the vulgar prejudices of merchants have had over the system of administration which these governments have adopted.
The account of these circumstances, with the discussion of the errors of this system, form the matter of the third and fourth books.
Political Economy is, of all sciences, that which affords most room for prejudices, and in which they are most liable to become deeply rooted. The desire of improving our condition, that universal principle, which continually acts upon every member of the community, is ever directing the thoughts of each individual to the means of increasing his private fortune. But should this individual ever chance to raise his views to the management of the public money, he would naturally be led to reason from analogy, and apply to the general interest of his country those principles which reflection and experience have led him to regard as the best guides in the conduct of his own private affairs. Thus, from attending to the fact, that money constitutes a part of the productive stock in the fortune of an individual, and that his fortune increases in proportion to the increase of this article, there arises that erroneous opinion so generally received, that money is a constituent part of national wealth, and that a country becomes rich, in proportion as it receives money from those countries with which it has commercial connections.
Merchants who have been accustomed to retire each night to their desks, to count, with eagerness, the quantity of currency, or of good debts, which their day's sale has produced, calculating their profits only by this result, and confident that such a calculation has never deceived them, are naturally led