Эротические рассказы

American Democracy in Context. Joseph A. PikaЧитать онлайн книгу.

American Democracy in Context - Joseph A. Pika


Скачать книгу
Uruguay; South Africa; Mozambique; Tunisia; all of Europe except U.K., Poland, and Finland; all countries from Russia to China; Vietnam; Cambodia; Australia

      Data unavailable: Western Sahara

      Back to Figure

      The horizontal axis lists the countries and the vertical axis shows the numbers from 0 to 450 in increments of 50.

      The details are as follows.

       Somalia: 13

       Singapore: 13

       Pakistan: 14 plus

       Japan: 15

       U.S.A.: 25

       Egypt: 43 plus

       Iraq: 52 plus

       Vietnam: 85 plus

       Saudi Arabia: 149

       Iran: 253 plus

       China: somewhere in the range of 400 to 450

      Note: Plus signs indicate that the figure calculated by Amnesty International is a minimum.

      Back to Figure

      The survey respondents were asked, “Are you in favor of the death penalty for a person convicted of murder?”

      The horizontal axis shows the dates of the survey from 1st to 6th of December 1937 to October 1 to 10 of 2018. The vertical axis shows the percent from 0 to 100.

      The lines representing those in favor and those not in favor follow a symmetrical pattern.

      The details are as follows, with all values approximated from the graph.

      Favor: The line starts at 60% in 1937, drops to 42% in 1966 and then rises to peak at 80% from 1988 to 1995 before dropping gradually to end at 55% in 2018.

      Not in favor: The line starts at 32% in 1937, rises to 48% in 1966 and then drops to a low of 8% in 1995 before rising gradually to end at 40% in 2018.

      5 Civil Rights

Several people standing under a rainbow flag carrying placards that read: Love is patient, love is kind, love perseveres; Love is love; and so on.

      The Washington Post / Getty Images

       After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:

       Identify how the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Supreme Court addressed slavery prior to the Civil War.

       Examine the history of discrimination against African Americans and their struggle for equal treatment after the Civil War.

       Evaluate the role of the courts in expanding African American civil rights in the twentieth century.

       Review the history of gender inequality in the United States.

       Analyze the roots and ramifications of ethnic discrimination in the United States.

       Investigate how the fight for civil rights has moved beyond race, gender, and ethnic origins, including expanded rights for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community.

       Explain the actions the federal government has taken toward redressing past discrimination and evaluate the effectiveness of these actions.

      Perspective: The Confederate Monument Debate

      There has been a renewed debate recently about what, if anything, to do with Confederate monuments. There are more than 700 of them in 31 states across the United States, in public spaces ranging from city squares to state capitols and courthouse grounds. Most of the monuments were erected decades after the Civil War ended, during the height of the so-called Jim Crow era of racial segregation from the 1890s through the 1950s. Rather than honoring Confederate soldiers who died in the war, as most monuments did in the immediate aftermath of the conflict, these glorified leaders of the Confederacy.1 Critics view them as symbols of white supremacy designed to defy civil rights. New Orleans mayor Mitch Landrieu agreed and ordered four such monuments to be removed in 2017.

      One of the four New Orleans monuments that were removed did not even directly commemorate the Civil War. Instead, the Liberty Place Monument, erected in 1891, commemorated an 1874 Reconstruction-era uprising led by white supremacists. An inscription added to the monument in 1932 hailed that uprising as an important step toward the results of the 1876 elections, which—as the inscription put it—“recognized white supremacy in the South and gave us our state.”2 The other three monuments that were removed in 2017 honored leaders of the Confederacy. One was a bronze statue of Jefferson Davis (the only president of the Confederacy), which had been dedicated in 1911 at a “whites only” ceremony on the 50th anniversary of Davis’s inauguration. Children wearing red, white, and blue formed a living Confederate battle flag and sang “Dixie” at the event. Another was a bronze statue of Confederate General G.T. Beauregard on horseback, unveiled in 1915 (the same year that the Hollywood film Birth of a Nation glorified the Civil War and the Ku Klux Klan). A time capsule in the giant marble base of the statue, put in place in 1913, contained Confederate flags, currency, medals, and a photo of Jefferson Davis.3 The final monument (and the oldest) was a bronze statue, dedicated in 1884, of Confederate General Robert E. Lee standing high atop a 60-foot column, facing north with his arms crossed. Debate about whether to remove similar monuments in Virginia drew national attention and led to violence soon thereafter.

The inscription on a memorial reads: United States troops took over the state government and reinstated the usurpers but the national election November 1876 recognized white supremacy in the south and gave us our state.

      The 1932 inscription on a Confederate memorial in New Orleans hailed the end of Reconstruction as recognition of white supremacy in the South.

      Although many aspects of the Civil War, the slavery issue, and race relations are distinctly American, many nations around the world have confronted similar questions about how to deal with monuments to former regimes. Understanding how they have dealt with the issue may offer guidance as we continue to struggle with how to resolve this contentious debate. In the aftermath of World War II, for example, the newly created Federal Republic of Germany (what we came to think of as “West Germany”) banned the swastika, the Nazi party, and even publication of Adolf Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf, and systematically removed Nazi-era memorials. In the years to come, it enacted laws against hate speech (Volksverhetzung—literally “incitement of the people”) and Holocaust denial, which remained in place after the reunification of East and West Germany. Thus, neo-Nazi marches are legal in the U.S., but not in Germany. No memorials to World War II generals grace the public squares of Germany nor is it legal to display the Nazi flag (though it is in the U.S.). Even Hitler’s bunker in Berlin, where he killed himself in 1945, has been paved over for fear that it would be treated as a shrine for neo-Nazis. On the other hand, memorials to the victims of the Nazi regime have been erected—from the massive Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe (mere steps away from the Hitler bunker) to tiny brass cobblestones called stolpersteine (“stumbling blocks”) on streets throughout Germany, providing brief biographical details of the men, women, and children deported from those locations to concentration camps during the war.4

The inscription on the brass marker in German mentions the name, year of birth, date and place of deportation, and date of death. A white rose has been placed beside it.

      Brass markers called stolpersteine across Germany mark the last official address of thousands of victims of the Holocaust and are engraved with biographical details.

      ODD ANDERSEN


Скачать книгу
Яндекс.Метрика