Mathematics for Enzyme Reaction Kinetics and Reactor Performance. F. Xavier MalcataЧитать онлайн книгу.
alt="equation"/>
here only the plus sign was kept, since cosh y > 0 as per Fig. 2.14a. Based on Eq. (2.479) rewritten for y, one finds that
(2.570)
following combination with Eqs. (2.567) and (2.569) – or, after applying logarithms to both sides,
(2.571)
that is the same to write
as per Eq. (2.566); a plot of Eq. (2.572) is conveyed by Fig. 2.15a. Note that
Figure 2.15 Variation, with their argument x, of inverse hyperbolic functions, viz. (a) inverse hyperbolic sine (sinh−1) and cosine (cosh−1) and (b) inverse hyperbolic tangent (tanh−1) and cotangent (cotanh−1).
By the same token, if one sets
(2.573)
then hyperbolic cosine may be applied to both sides to produce
– again due to the inefficacy, with regard to its argument, of composing a function with its inverse. Upon combination of Eq. (2.496), rewritten for y, with Eq. (2.574), one obtains
(2.575)
where isolation of sinh y yields
– with both signs preceding the square root being now feasible, since sinh y may take either positive or negative values (see Fig. 2.14 a); once in possession of Eqs. (2.574) and (2.576), one may resort to Eq. (2.479), with x relabeled as y, to write
Application of logarithms to both sides of Eq. (2.577) finally gives
(2.578)
or else
(2.579)
with the aid of Eq. (2.573), as depicted also in Fig. 2.15a. In this case,
Following a similar rationale, one may calculate the inverse hyperbolic tangent – by, once again, setting
at startup, in parallel to Eq. (2.566) – thus implying that
as per composition of functions; consequently,
(2.582)
owing to Eqs. (2.482) and (2.581), which becomes
after elimination of denominator. Upon insertion of Eq. (2.581), one obtains
(2.584)