Mathematics for Enzyme Reaction Kinetics and Reactor Performance. F. Xavier MalcataЧитать онлайн книгу.
(3.17)
with the equal sign holding when u and v are collinear with the same orientation; coupled with
(3.18)
with the equal sign holding again when u and v are collinear and point in the same direction. Here ∠ u, v and ∠ u, u + v denote the angles formed by vectors u and v, and by vectors u and u + v, respectively. Since such coordinates are simply the normal projection of the vector at stake onto the corresponding Cartesian axes, addition of two vectors corresponds to merely adding the homologous coordinates, i.e.
based on Eqs. (3.1) and (3.2); both these statements are apparent from inspection of Fig. 3.1a.
Figure 3.1 Graphical representation of (a) addition of two vectors, u and v, and (b) multiplication of scalar α by vector u .
Addition of vectors is commutative – since, according to Eq. (3.19),
(3.20)
this is equivalent to
as per the commutative property of addition of scalars – so
following combination of Eqs. (3.19) and (3.21).
Given a third vector w – defined as
one may recall Eqs. (3.1), (3.2), and (3.19) to write
because of the commutative property of vector addition as per Eq. (3.22), one can rewrite Eq. (3.24) as
(3.25)
whereas Eq. (3.19) leads to
with the aid of Eqs. (3.1), (3.2), and (3.23). Algebraic rearrangement of Eq. (3.26) – at the expense again of Eq. (3.19), produces
(3.27)
which leads directly to
(3.28)
due to Eq. (3.22); one finally attains
(3.29)
in view again of Eqs. (3.19) and (3.23) – so addition of vectors is associative.
3.2 Multiplication of Scalar by Vector
Another common operation is multiplication of vector u by scalar α; this produces a new vector αu, collinear with u but with opposite direction if α < 0 – with length given by |α|‖ u ‖, as apparent in Fig. 3.1b. Using vector coordinates, one accordingly finds that
– so the coordinates in each direction of space are expanded (or contracted) proportionally. Based on Eq. (3.30), one may equivalently write
due to the commutativity of the product of scalars, Eq. (3.31) yields
(3.32)
One therefore concludes that
following