Dynamic Spectrum Access Decisions. George F. ElmasryЧитать онлайн книгу.
A signal is time varying and can convey information or not convey information. Noise is a type of signal that does not convey information. Some jammers can also be a type of signal that does not convey information. A signal can be a function of time and a function of other independent variables.
A signal is categorized as an energy signal if it has finite energy, that is, 0 < E < ∞. When the signal is analyzed over a given time duration and the signal energy can be measured, it is an energy signal. An example of that signal is a pulse signal where the pulse is either positive or negative. A decaying pulse signal is also an energy signal because its energy can be measured over a given time duration. On the other hand, a sinusoidal signal energy cannot be measured in time domain, and hence it cannot be categorized19 as an energy signal. The sinusoidal signal is a power signal. Moving from time domain to frequency domain, the sinusoidal signal power spectral density can be measured. The sinusoidal signal is a power signal over infinite time. A signal can be categorized as a power signal when it has finite power without time limitation.
Notice that with spectrum sensing, we may sense a modulated signal over a sinusoidal wave (carrier). We look at frequency bands of carrier frequencies and hence we measure the signal power. The term “energy detection” is used loosely with spectrum sensing and it means integrating the measured signal power over a limited time period (time of sensing or dwell time). With spectrum sensing, the correct term for energy detection should be power integration over a finite time. The term “energy detection” is widely used because spectrum sensors integrate the sensed power spectral density over the sensing time period and the process of integration over time leads to using the term energy detection. In spectrum sensing references, spectrum sensing is a multidimensional process that considers time, frequency, and power. Power here can be power spectral density measured over limited time. The simplest way of spectrum sensing is known as energy detection, which integrates the power spectral density measured by the spectrum sensor, in frequency domain, over a given sensing period.
Bibliography
1 Abdulstar, M. and Hussein, Z., Energy detection techniques for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio: A survey. International Journal of Compute Networks and Communications, vol. 4, no. 5, September 2012.
2 Cabric, D.B., Cognitive radios: System design perspective. University of California, Berkeley, UMI Microform 3306077.
3 Cabric, D., Tkachenko, A., and Brodersen, R., Spectrum sensing measurements of pilot, energy, and collaborative detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Military Communications Conference, Washington, D.C., USA, October 2006.
4 Cordeiro, C., Challapali, K., and Birru, D., IEEE 802.22: An introduction to the first wireless standard based on cognitive radios. Journal of Communications, vol. 1, no. 1, April 2006.
5 Digham, F., Alouini, M., and Simon, M., On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communication, vol. 5, Seattle, Washington, USA, May 2003, pp. 3575–3579.
6 Elmasry, G.F., Tactical Wireless Communications and Networks, Design Concepts and Challenges. Wiley, 2012. ISBN: 978‐1‐1199‐5176‐6.
7 Federal Communications Commission, Notice of proposed rulemaking and order: Facilitating opportunities for flexible, efficient, and reliable spectrum use employing cognitive radio technologies. ET Docket No. 03‐108, February 2005.
8 Gandetto, M. and Regazzoni, C., Spectrum sensing: A distributed approach for cognitive terminals. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communications, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 546–557, April 2007.
9 Geirhofer, S., Tong, L., and Sadler, B., A measurement‐based model for dynamic spectrum access in WLAN channels. In Proceedings of the IEEE Military Communications Conference, Washington, D.C., USA, October 2006.
10 Geirhofer, S., Tong, L., and Sadler, B., Dynamic spectrum access in the time domain: Modeling and exploiting white space. IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 66–72, May 2007.
11 Ghasemi, A. and Sousa, E.S., Asymptotic performance of collaborative spectrum sensing under correlated log‐normal shadowing. IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 34–36, January 2007.
12 Guzelgoz, S., Celebi, H., and Arslan, H., Statistical characterization of the paths in multipath PLC channels. Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 181–187, January 2011.
13 Haykins, S, Cognitive radio: brain empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 201–220, February 2005.
14 Hu, W., Willkomm, D., Abusubaih, M., et al., Dynamic frequency hopping communities for efficient IEEE 802.22 operation. IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 80–87, May 2007.
15 Lehtomäki, J., Vartiainen, J., Juntti, M., and Saarnisaari, H., Spectrum sensing with forward methods. In Proceedings of the IEEE Military Communications Conference, Washington, D.C., USA, October 2006.
16 Leu, A., McHenry, M., and Mark, B., Modeling and analysis of interference in listen‐before‐talk spectrum access schemes. International Journal of Network Management, vol. 16, pp. 131–147, 2006.
17 Marcus, M., Unlicensed cognitive sharing of TV spectrum: the controversy at the federal communications commission. IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 24–25, 2005.
18 Mathur, C.N. and Subbalakshmi, K.P., Digital signatures for centralized DSA networks. In First IEEE Workshop on Cognitive Radio Networks, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, January 2007, pp. 1037–1041.
19 Mitola, J., Cognitive Radio An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio. PhD thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2000.
20 Mitola, J., Cognitive Radio Architecture, in Cognitive Networks: Towards Self‐Aware Networks (ed. Q.H. Mahmoud). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2007. doi: 10.1002/9780470515143.
21 Naraghi‐Pour, M. and Ikuma, T., Autocorrelation‐based spectrum sensing for cognitive radios. Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 2, February 2010.
22 Papadimitratos, P., Sankaranarayanan, S., and Mishra, A., A bandwidth sharing approach to improve licensed spectrum utilization. IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 10–14, December 2005.
23 Pawełczak, P. Janssen, G.J., and Prasad, R.V., Performance measures of dynamic spectrum access networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Globecom), San Francisco, California, USA, November/December 2006.
24 Rossi, P., Ciuonzo, D., and Romano, G., Orthogonality and cooperation in collaborative spectrum sensing through MIMO decision fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 11, November 2013.
25 Shobana, S., Saravanan, R., and Muthaiah, R., Matched filter‐based spectrum sensing on cognitive radio for OFDM WLANs. International Journal of Engineering and technology, vol. 5 no 1, February 2013.
26 Sun, Z., Bradford, G., and Laneman, J., Sequence detection algorithm for PHY‐Layer sensing in dynamic spectrum access networks. Proceedings of the. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97–109.
27 Yucek, T. and Arslan, H., A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 1, first quarter 2009.
Notes
1 1