Engineering Solutions for CO2 Conversion. Группа авторовЧитать онлайн книгу.
At lower development stage, solvents can be encapsulated in thin polymer shells and be considered as a bed of capsules containing the solvent. Capsules must be permeable enough to allow carbon dioxide to get in contact with the solvent but strong enough to resist the high regeneration temperatures during a number of cycles [25]. The benefit of this configuration is to increase the surface area of the solvent in contact with the flue gas and avoid issues related to viscosity and precipitation.
Recently, ionic liquids (ILs) are of great interest. These are composed of ions and are at liquid state below 100 °C. If the melting point is below the room temperature, these are referred as room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs). These solvents are recognized by their low vapor pressure, high thermal and chemical stability, nonflammability, and high viscosity. These properties open new possibilities for the solvent regeneration at different pressures and temperatures, which can be optimized accordingly. Some ILs show a high absorption capacity, although the viscosity could be decremental for the mass transfer.
Physical solvents are characterized for the high physical solubility of CO2 in these and are especially interesting for flue gas with high CO2 content [26]. There are commercial processes based on this principle, such as Rectisol®, Selexol®, Purisol®, Morphysorb®, and Fluor®, particularly effective at high concentrations of acid gas, high pressure, and low temperature [27] and are characterized by their low vapor pressure, low toxicity, and low corrosion [15].
An emerging pathway is the use of hybrid solvents, solutions containing amine/s and organic compound/s with or without the presence of water, the former called as water‐lean solvents. The goal is to maintain an enhanced physical absorption by substituting partial/totally the water content and maintaining a considerable chemical reaction by keeping the amine in the solution. It is known that at low concentration of the amine(s), the physical solubility plays an important role and the diffusivity can also become an important factor in viscous solutions. The enhanced solubility of CO2 in organic solvents, compared to water, has been widely studied in the past [28–31], and this presents advantages in its application in chemical absorption. During the desorption, the main energy penalty is due to the water evaporation. Decreasing the water content will decrease this energy penalty. Partial and total substitution of water by organic solvents has been considered as an alternative to decrease the steam consumption in the desorber. However, as studied in Ref. [32], the absorption kinetics would just be favorable, compared with aqueous amine solutions, at certain conditions of pressure and temperature in the absorber. The total substitution of water in water‐lean solvents will limit the reactions that take place in solution: hydrolysis will not occur and the carbamate and bicarbamate ions will be nonexistent [33]. However, the net benefit in the energy consumption when using water‐lean solvents is not yet clear, as discussed in Ref. [34].
1.2.4.4.1 Advances on Process Configurations
As mentioned previously, chemical absorption is the most advanced technology, reaching commercial status (TRL 9). However, there are still barriers that slow down its application in industrial and power sectors. Cost is one of the challenges to overcome and energy consumption has a strong contribution. The development of new solvents and improvements on the process flow sheet and/or its integration in the industrial or power facility could reduce this energy consumption.
The common process modifications can be divided as in Ref. [35]: (i) absorption enhancement, (ii) heat integration, and (iii) heat pumps. Perhaps these can also be classified by their purpose, as in Ref. [36]: (i) increase of rich solvent loading, (ii) reduction of the specific reboiler duty, or (iii) combination of both. The enhancement on the absorption and desorption processes and its impact on costs will depend on other factors such as the solvent and the facility. The modifications on the stripper to reduce energy consumption are being considered for the next generation of post‐combustion processes' configurations with advanced solvents (e.g. as in Ref. [37]).
1.2.5 Others CO2 Capture/Separation Technologies
Other CO2 capture/separation technologies such as electrochemical, cryogenic separation, liquefaction, microbial/microalgae, or direct air separation are described in the literature.
Hybrid technologies have been studied in the past years, aiming to achieve higher capture rates and/or sum up the advantages of each CO2 capture technology. The hybrid processes can be classified into absorption‐based, adsorption‐based, membrane‐based, and cryogen‐based hybrid processes. The integration of membranes into the absorption process (such as in the membrane contractor arrangement), catalysis process, and cryogenic process has progressed over the past years. However, the majority of the results are based on simulations or small‐scale testing campaigns, and the real value of using two technologies is not clear [38].
Within the range of emerging technologies, electrochemical separation has had a fast development over the past years and, potentially, will continue in this pathway. The following Section 1.2.5.1 will be focused on fuel cells because of the growing expectation on this electrochemical separation technology for its integration in power plants.
1.2.5.1 Fuel Cells
Fuel cells convert chemical energy of a gaseous fuel directly into electricity and heat. The fuel is oxidized electrochemically, which leads to lower exergy losses compared to direct combustion. In general, fuel cells are classified by the electrolyte material and their operating temperature (Figure 1.9). Low‐temperature fuel cells (100–250 °C) include alkaline fuel cells (AFCs), phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFCs), and proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), while high‐temperature fuel cells (600–900 °C) refer to Molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs) and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). Because of the high temperature at which MCFCs and SOFCs operate, natural gas reformation and the subsequent shift reaction can be performed in the fuel cell itself. MCFCs and SOFCs are most appropriate for stationary power production at scales ranging from a few hundred kilowatts up to a few megawatts because of their high electrical efficiencies and the ability for cogeneration of electricity and heat [39]. Moreover, SOFCs and MCFCs are more fuel flexible and are not poisoned by carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.
Figure 1.9 Two main options for CO2 capture using fuel cells. (a) The FC oxidizes a fuel taking oxygen from air and later separating CO2 from the anode effluent. (b) The MCFC concentrates the CO2 in flue gas from a conventional power plant from the cathode inlet to the anode outlet, while also oxidizing a portion of additional fuel.
Source: Adapted from [11].
When MCFCs/SOFCs are fueled with natural gas or syngas, CO2 capture can be implemented at different points, for example, after the fuel cell (“post‐anode capture”). Alternatively, H2 can be produced by reforming/partial oxidation of natural gas or coal gasification upstream the fuel cell and CO2 can be removed after syngas is shifted by means of physical solvents, membranes, or adsorbents – “pre‐anode CO2 capture,” similar to pre‐combustion.
Fuel cells generally operate with an approach that is similar to the “oxyfuel” concept, oxidizing fuel with oxygen extracted from air while generating power and releasing concentrated effluents at the anode outlet (Figure 1.9). This kind of power cycles