River Restoration. Группа авторовЧитать онлайн книгу.
E.S. (2010). River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55: 205–222.
163 Perni, Á., Martínez‐Paz, J., and Martínez‐Carrasco, F. (2012). Social preferences and economic valuation for water quality and river restoration: the Segura River, Spain. Water and Environment Journal 26(2): 274–284.
164 Piégay, H., Gregory, K.J., Bondarev, V., et al. (2005). Public perception as a barrier to introducing wood in rivers for restoration purposes. Environmental Management 36(5): 665–674.
165 Polizzi, C., Simonetto, M., Barausse, A., et al. (2015). Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 14: 158–169.
166 Purcell, A.H., Friedrich, C., and Resh, V.H. (2002). An assessment of a small urban stream restoration project in northern California. Restoration Ecology 10(4): 685–694.
167 Randall, A. (1987). Total economic value as a basis for policy. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116(3): 325–335.
168 Redman, C.L., Grove, J.M., and Kuby, L.H. (2004). Integrating social science into the Long‐Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7(2): 161–171.
169 Roni, P. and Beechie, T. (2013). Introduction to restoration: key steps for designing effective programs and projects. In: Stream and Watershed Restoration: A Guide to Restoring Riverine Processes and Habitats (eds P. Roni and T. Beechie), 1–11. Chichester: Wiley.
170 Saarinen, T.F. and Sell, J.L. (1980). Environmental perception. Progress in Human Geography 4(4): 525–548.
171 Schläpfer, F. and Witzig, P.J. (2006). Public support for river restoration funding in relation to local river ecomorphology, population density, and mean income. Water Resources Research 42(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004940.
172 Seidl, R. and Stauffacher, M. (2013). Evaluation of river restoration by local residents. Water Resources Research 49(10): 7077–7087.
173 Shields, F.D., Cooper Jr, C.M., Knight, S.S., et al. (2003). Stream corridor restoration research: a long and winding road. Ecological Engineering 20(5): 441–454.
174 Smith, B., Clifford, N.J., and Mant, J. (2014). The changing nature of river restoration. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 1(3): 249–261.
175 Sneddon, C.S., Barraud, R., and Germaine, M.A. (2017). Dam removals and river restoration in international perspective. Water Alternatives 10(3): 648–654.
176 Soto‐Montes de Oca, G. and Ramirez‐Fuentes, A. (2019). Value of river restoration when living near and far: the Atoyac Basin in Puebla, Mexico. Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24850/j‐tyca‐2019‐01‐07.
177 Stanford, J.A., Ward, J.V., Liss, W.J., et al. (1996). A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12(4–5): 391–413.
178 Steffen, W., Crutzen, P.J., and McNeill, J.R. (2007). The anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36(8): 214–221.
179 Sudding, K.N. (2011). Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 42: 465–487.
180 Szałkiewicz, E., Jusik, S., and Grygoruk, M. (2018). Status of and perspectives on river restoration in Europe: 310,000 euros per hectare of restored river. Sustainability 10(1): 129.
181 Tanaka, A. (2006). Stakeholder analysis of river restoration activity for eight years in a river channel. In: Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation (eds A.T. Bull and D.L. Hawksworth), 447–471. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
182 Thorel, M., Piégay, H., Barthelemy, C., et al. (2018). Socio‐environmental implications of process‐based restoration strategies in large rivers: should we remove novel ecosystems along the Rhône (France)? Regional Environmental Change 18(7): 2019–2031.
183 Trumble, W.R. and Stevenson, A. (eds) (2002). Shorter Oxford English Dictionary: Volume 1. New York: Oxford University Press.
184 Tunstall, S.M., Penning‐Rowsell, E.C., Tapsell, S.M., et al. (2000). River restoration: public attitudes and expectations. Water and Environment Journal 14(5): 363–370.
185 Tunstall, S.M., Tapsell, S.M., and Eden, S. (1999). How stable are public responses to changing local environments? A “before” and “after” case study of river restoration. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42(4): 527–545.
186 Turner, R.E. and Boyer, M.E. (1997). Mississippi River diversions, coastal wetland restoration/creation and an economy of scale. Ecological Engineering 8(2): 117–128.
187 Turner, R.K., Pearce, D., and Bateman, I. (1994). Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
188 van den Berg, A.E., Koole, S.L., and van der Wulp, N.Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (how) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology 23(2): 135–146.
189 Vásquez, W.F. and de Rezende, C.E. (2019). Willingness to pay for the restoration of the Paraíba do Sul River: a contingent valuation study from Brazil. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 19(4): 610–619.
190 Vaughan, I.P., Diamond, M., Gurnell, A.M., et al. (2009). Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19(1): 113–125.
191 Verbrugge, L. and van den Born, R. (2018). The role of place attachment in public perceptions of a re‐landscaping intervention in the river Waal (the Netherlands). Landscape and Urban Planning 177: 241–250.
192 Vermaat, J.E., Wagtendonk, A.J., Brouwer, R., et al. (2016). Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach. Hydrobiologia 769(1): 121–135.
193 Vining, J., Tyler, E., and Kweon B.S. (2000). Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. In: Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities (eds P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull), 143–162. Washington DC: Island Press.
194 Vörösmarty, C.J., McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O., et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467(7315): 555–561.
195 Weber, C., Åberg, U., Buijse, A.D., et al. (2018). Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 5(1): 1257.
196 Weber, M.A. and Stewart, S. (2009). Public values for river restoration options on the Middle Rio Grande. Restoration Ecology 17(6): 762–771.
197 Wells, H.B.M. and Dougill, A.J. (2019). The importance of long term social ecological: research for the future of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 27(5): 929–933.
198 Westling, E.L., Surridge, B.W., Sharp, L., et al. (2014). Making sense of landscape change: long‐term perceptions among local residents following river restoration. Journal of Hydrology 519: 2613–2623.
199 Wilson, E.O. (1992). Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
200 Woelfle‐Erskine, C. (2017). Collaborative approaches to flow restoration in intermittent salmon‐bearing streams: Salmon Creek, CA, USA. Water 9(3): 217.
201 Wohl, E., Lane, S.N., and Wilcox, A.C. (2015). The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resources Research 51(8): 5974–5997.
202 Wohl, E., Angermeier, P.L., Bledsoe, B., et al. (2005). River restoration. Water Resources Research 41(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003985.
203 Wortley, L., Hero, J.M., and Howes, M. (2013). Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature.