Continuous Emission Monitoring. James A. JahnkeЧитать онлайн книгу.
at Air & Waste Management Association meeting, Denver, paper 93‐WA‐172.02P (18–23 June 1995).
24 Geary, A and Sinada, C.D. (2018). Effects of sample conditioning on SO2 retention and measured emissions. Paper presented at the Power Plant Pollutant and Effluent Control MEGA Symposium, Baltimore (20–23 August 2018).
25 Gerhab, G.G. and Schuyler, A. (1996). Highly inert sample pathways, paper 96‐005. In: Proceedings of the Instrument Society of America, 43–58. Research Triangle Park, NC: ISA.
26 Green, D.W. and Perry, R.H. (ed.) (2007). Chemical Engineer's Handbook, 8ee. New York: McGraw Hill.
27 Hoard, J., Venkataramanan, N., and Marshik, B., and Murphy, W. (2014). NH3 storage in sample lines. SAE Technical Paper 2014‐01‐1586. Paper presented at SAE 2014 World Congress & Exhibition, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014‐01‐1586 (accessed 11 November 2021).
28 Jahnke, J.A. (1997). Assessment of New and Alternative Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
29 Jahnke, J.A. and Marshall, R.P. (1994). Pressure and Temperature Effects in Dilution Extractive Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems, TR‐104700. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
30 Josseau, M. (2009). Development in micro sampling solutions. Power Point Presentation. MicroReactors and Micro‐analytical Workshop, Rome (23–25 March 2009). Center for Process Analytical Chemistry.
31 Koch, M.V., Vanden Bussche, K.M., and Chrisman, R.W. (ed.) (2007). Micros Instrumentation: For High Throughput Experimentation and Process Intensification – a Tool for PAT. Wiley.
32 Mandel, S.B. and Gottlieb, M.S. (1995). Development of a close‐coupled multigas analyzer for continuous emissions monitoring. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association Meeting, San Antonio, paper 95‐TA16B.04 (18–23 June 1995).
33 Marquardt, B., Thompson, W., Dearing, T. et al. (2009). Combining analytical sensors and new sampling/sensor initiative (NeSSI) to improve process understanding. Power Point Presentation. Micro‐Reactors and Micro‐analytical Workshop, Rome (23–25 March 2009). Center for Process Analytical Chemistry.
34 Marshak, B. (2015). Material and process conditions for successful use of extractive sampling techniques. Paper presented at EPA Region 6 – 25th Annual Quality Assurance Conferences (21 October 2015). https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015‐11/documents/c15‐marshik‐p2.pdf (accessed 11 November 2021).
35 Marshak, B. (2019). Lack of regulation of NH3 CEMS systems. Presented at the EPRI CEM Users Group Meeting, Birmingham, AL (8–9 May 2019).
36 McGowan, G.F. (1976). Discussion of Alternative Emission Measurement Schemes for Wet Scrubber Applications, Technical note. Englewood, CO: Lear Siegler, Inc.
37 McGowan, G.F. (1994). A review of CEM measurement techniques. Paper presented at Northern Rocky Mountain ISA Conference (6–8 April 1994). Research Triangle, NC: ISA.
38 McNulty, K.J., McCoy, J.F., Becker, J.H. et al. (1974). Investigation of Extractive Sampling Interface Parameters. EPA‐650/2‐74‐089.
39 Miller, S.B. (1994). Certification and utilization of multicomponent EPA protocol gases. Paper presented at EPRI CEM Users Group Meeting, Minneapolis.
40 Munukutla, S.S. (1992). Theory‐Based Evaluation of Pressure, Temperature and Density Effects on the Operation of the Dilution Probe, unpublished preliminary report. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
41 Myers, R.L. (1986). Field experiences using dilution probe techniques for continuous source emission monitoring. In: Transactions – Continuous Emission Monitoring – Advances and Issues, 431–439. Pittsburgh: Air Pollution Control Association.
42 Peeler, J.W., Jahnke, J.A., Juneau, P.J., and Kinner, L.L. (1997). Handbook – Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems for Non‐criteria Pollutants. EPA/625/R‐97/001. Washington DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
43 Pellikka, T., Kajolinna, T., and Perälä, M. (2019). SO2 emission measurement with the European standard reference method, EN 14791, and alternative methods – observations from laboratory and field studies. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 69 (9): 1122–1131.
44 Permapure (2019). All About NafionTM Tubing. https://www.permapure.com/nafion‐tubing (accessed 11 November 2021).
45 Podlenski, J., Peduto, E., McInnes, R. et al. (1984). Feasibility Study for Adapting Present Combustion Source Continuous Monitoring Systems to Hazardous Waste Incinerators. Volume 1. Adaptability Study and Guidelines Document. EPA‐600/8‐84‐011a. Washington DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
46 Reynolds, W.E. (1989). Field Inspector's Audit Techniques: Gas CEMS's Which Accept Calibration Gases. EPA/340/1‐89‐003. Washington DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
47 Robinson, W.R. 2010. Survey of umbilical line performance. Paper presented at the CEM User’s Group Meeting, Electric Power Research Institute Meeting, Cleveland (12–14 May 2010).
48 Romero, C.E., Yilmaz, A., Levy, E.K. et al. (1999). Analysis of sampling errors in dilution extractive CEM probes. Paper presented at EPRI CEM Users Group Meeting, Cincinnati. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335365870 (accessed 11 November 2021).
49 Romero, C.E., Sarunac, N., Levy, E.K., and Bilirgen, H. (2002). Techniques to improve measurement accuracy in power plant reported emissions. ISA Instrumentation Systems and Automation Conference, Chicago (October 2002).
50 Romero, C.E., Sarunac, N., Levy, E.K., and Bilirgen, H. (2005). Techniques to improve measurement accuracy in power plant reported emissions of NOx and SO2. Ingenieria Mecanica Tecnologia y Desarrolo 1 (6): 215–222. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335365942.
51 Sadegh, A. and Worek, W. (ed.) (2017). Mechanical Engineer's Handbook, 12ee. New York: McGraw‐Hill.
52 Sale, J.W. (2000a). Modified Dilution Extractive Probe Reduces NOx Measurement Bias Error. Lehigh Energy Update. February 2000, Vol. 18(1). https://www.lehigh.edu/energy/leu/leu_21.pdf
53 Sale, J.W. (2000b). Dilution Extractive Probe Improvements Now Available Commercially. Lehigh Energy Update. August 2000, Vol. 18(2). https://www.lehigh.edu/~inenr/leu/leu_24.pdf
54 Schakenbach, J. Fax, G., and Werner, A. (2002) Spin off of selected CEMS‐related QA activities selected CEMS‐related QA activities. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association Meeting, Baltimore, paper 42583 (23–27 June 2002).
55 Shahin, B. (2016). Multipoint probes to mitigate stratification. Power Point Presentation. CEMTEK Users Meeting. 28 September 2016. Costa Mesa, CA. https://www.cemteks.com/2016‐seminar‐training.
56 Shapiro, A.H. (1953). The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow. New York: Ronald Press.
57 Sherman, R.E. (2005). Modular Sample Systems: Circor Tech Substrates & Industry‐wide Components. Center for Process Analytical Chemistry Spring 2005 NeSSI User Group Meeting. Seattle: University of Washington Center for Process Analytical Chemistry.
58 Silcotek. (2017). Silcotek 101. https://www.silcotek.com
59 Sneek, E. (1997). Optimization of continuous emission monitoring of NOx and SO2. In: Proceedings – International Workshop on Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM97), 87–99. London: IEA Coal Research.
60 Swaans, W., Barbers, R., Lenaers, G. et al. 2018. Richlijnen voor omgang met meetgaskoelers bij de meting van NO2 en SO2 in vochtig afgas. Department