Case No. 666: case of murder. Дмитрий Георгиевич БоррониЧитать онлайн книгу.
for themselves.
The horn carelessly threw:
− What facts else there? Ha! The facts at you. You show these facts, and then we will talk.
− the Facts by itself, − were told by the investigator. − I want to carry out before a confrontation or that you, Eduard Velyaminovich, passed the lie detector. What can быль more simply?
The lawyer looked at Korystolyubov. That sat at a table and, looking at a table, reflected on something. He did not know that in general Kozlov told it. But only he, according to him, had to be that prosecution witness on whom the investigator insisted.
Confrontation. What will it give it? He did not know that Kozlov told. Yes what he is Kozlov, a goat more nobody.
− I agree to a confrontation, − Korystolyubov unexpectedly said. − we will Also finish it.
− you are sure?
− it is absolute, Pyotr Rodionovich.
− Here and well, – the investigator told. − Being guided by article No. 192 Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, I carry out a confrontation.
Article No. 192 Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation states. If in testimonies of earlier interrogated persons there are essential contradictions, then the investigator has the right to carry out a confrontation. The confrontation is carried out according to the article No. 164 of the present Criminal code.
There passed one hour − and a confrontation.
Before a confrontation the Horn took an interest:
− Why you agreed to a confrontation? The investigator had no proofs of your fault. − He looked at him. − Or you something are afraid?
− I will not pass the lie detector, and the confrontation − who knows, than it threatens me?
− you know who your splinter in a bum?
− I Guess.
− Who?
− Kozlov Ivan Fedorovich. He is my personal worker on especially important issues.
The horn watchfully asked:
− That is?
He already knew Korystolyubov's answer, but wanted to hear these words from it. And he heard.
− you correctly understood me.
CONFRONTATION:
Investigator's camera.
In the camera there was a table. And five chairs. What surprised Korystolyubov. On a table there was a telephone set. At the telephone set the investigator sat, and to the right of it Korystolyubov and his lawyer Who was invited a dream a confrontation on articles No. 53 Codes of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation by the client sat. Now they waited, waited for the person with whom the confrontation was appointed. Korystolyubov considered that it is Kozlov, with him at them the confrontation will take place. But he was mistaken. The assistant to the investigator came into the camera. He told:
− the Detainee is brought.
After these words at Korystolyubov ran goosebumps on a body. He was frightened. Who it could be? Who in general this woman? I know it. These questions tormented Korystolyubov.
The investigator told:
− Invite.
Shura escorted by entered the camera in handcuffs.
Having seen it, Korystolyubov got up from the place. It had no words. It became marble. It was visible that he was frightened.
− Well, hi, Eduard Veniaminovich, did not expect, the bastard. − She spat on a floor. − Bough.
Korystolyubov immediately said:
− I do not know who this person. I did not meet it. And in general, all this − provocation, and I any questions it does not intend to answer. So write down in the protocol.
− it is good, − the investigator told. Also entered all words of Eduard Velyaminovich in the protocol. – Be in your opinion. – Then the investigator addressed Shura: − you what tell?
Shura sat down at a table. Looked at Korystolyubov with the look full of hatred, and told:
− This bastard finished off Zhenya.
The investigator looked at Korystolyubov.
− This mental, − he told, − does not know in general what he speaks about. I do not want to listen to its and its nonsense.
The investigator noticed:
− But you agreed to a confrontation?
− Yes, − Eduard confirmed, − agreed.
− Here you a confrontation, − were told by the investigator and assumed: − Perhaps you expected to see other person?
Korystolyubov pretended that it does not understand about whom it there is a speech.
− That? Whom do you mean?
− For example, there is nobody Kozlov Ivan Fedorovich.
− Who is he? − Eduard made the surprised look. − I with such surname know nobody.
− And he knows you, − the investigator told and, having taken the call of the telephone set, asked to bring.
The door of the cell opened, and escorted by from two people the person entered the camera. He was exhausted, and it was visible with the naked eye that it is tired. Tired of infinite and monotonous questions of the investigator.
The investigator took an interest at Korystolyubov:
− you know this person?
Korystolyubov threw carelessly come and told:
− For the first time I see this person.
Goats of villages at a table.
The lawyer interfered, he told:
− my client declared officially that he does not know these two people. And therefore it does not intend to answer the questions asked here.
The investigator answered:
− This its right. But for the protocol it is obliged to answer one question.
The horn asked:
− What?
The investigator began a confrontation.
− Korystolyubov, − he told, − you can not answer or answer my questions, it is yours the right. But you are obliged to answer two questions.
Korystolyubov asked:
− What.
− What is your name?
− Korystolyubov Eduard Velyaminovich.
− you are familiar with the people who are present here?
− Is not present, he is not familiar.
The investigator entered in the protocol of interrogation of a word of Korystolyubov and took an interest at Shura.
− What is your name?
− Krapin Alexander Evgenyevich or just Shura.
− you transsexual?
− Is not present.
− you transvestite?
− Yes.
whether − you Know this person?
− Yes, it is Korystolyubov Eduard Velyaminovich.
− From where you know it?
− He attended our show more than once
− What show?
− Shaw of transvestites.
The investigator addressed Korystolyubov.
− Korystolyubov, you confirm Krapin's words?
The